Legal Opinion

People v. Warren

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 21, 2018No. F073159PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

*903Appellant Guy Barrett Warren pleaded no contest to three offenses arising from an incident in which he brandished a gun. He received a seven-year sentence that included four one-year enhancements under Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b).1 Each enhancement was based on a prior felony conviction and its associated prison term.

Warren argues that one of the enhancements was imposed erroneously because the prior offense on which it was based had been reclassified as a misdemeanor pursuant to Proposition 47 before sentencing, and therefore no longer qualified as the basis of an enhancement…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Kelly, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Global Fin. Distribs. v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. Baldwin, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Amir v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Amir v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Superior Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API