Legal Opinion

United States v. Jason Lee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 2012No. 10-10403PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether the district court erred by sentencing Jason Lee as a career offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1 based on his two prior convictions under California Health and Safety Code § 11352(a). We hold that the government has not satisfied its burden of showing that one of these two convictions qualifies as a predicate offense and remand for the district court to reconsider Lee’s career offender status.

I

Jason Lee was convicted of distributing crack cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. The district court sentenced Lee as a career…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Moses Corona-Sanchez, A/K/A Enrique Sanchez-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. VidalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. SnellenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Jose Lopez-Vasquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Quawntay Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Jonathan ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Jason LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Marcus CrumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API