Legal Opinion
Board of Education v. Celotex Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Aaron E. Klein, J.
The defendant, Perkins and Will, a partnership, moves this court, pursuant to CPLR 3212, for an order granting summary judgment in its favor and dismissing the action as against it on the ground that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.
The underlying facts are not in dispute, and are relatively simple. The movant was retained by the plaintiff in 1969 to provide architectural services with respect to the erection of the Tri-Valley Elementary School building. Construction of the building began in July or August, 1971; the school was occupied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cubito v. KreisbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Sosnow v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Board of Education of Tri-Valley Central School District at Grahamsville v. Celotex Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982