Legal Opinion
Board of Education of Tri-Valley Central School District at Grahamsville v. Celotex Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at *714Special Term (Klein, J.), entered June 17, 1981 in Sullivan County, which granted defendant Perkins & Will’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it. At issue in the instant matter is at what point in time does the six-year Statute of Limitations begin to run in an action, pursuant to CPLR 213, against an architect for professional malpractice. The underlying facts are undisputed. Plaintiff engaged defendant Perkins & Will (defendant architect), a partnership, as architect for the construction of an elementary school.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milwaukee County v. Schmidt, Garden & EriksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Naetzker v. Brocton Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- N. R. S. Construction Corp. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Board of Education v. Celotex Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. LundinNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cabrini Medical Center v. DesinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- BD. OF EDUC. OF TRI-VALLEY CENT. SCH. DIST. AT GRAHAMSVILLE v. Celotex Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Town of Wawarsing v. Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Arbitration between Kohn Pederson Fox Associates & FDICAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.