Sosnow v. Paul
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs, on the majority memorandum at the Appellate Division, with the following additional comment: While, if they were correct, the dissenters at the Appellate Division were properly repelled by the idea that a Statute of Limitations should preclude a cause of action before it ever accrued, that was not the case here. Upon completion of the buildings a cause of action accrued for the harm done, namely, the cost of correction of the defects in the buildings constructed, or, if the defects were not remediable, the difference in value…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bellizzi v. Huntley Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by44 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Brushton-Moira Central School District v. Fred H. Thomas Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.