Legal Opinion

Sosnow v. Paul

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1975PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order of the Appellate Division affirmed, with costs, on the majority memorandum at the Appellate Division, with the following additional comment: While, if they were correct, the dissenters at the Appellate Division were properly repelled by the idea that a Statute of Limitations should preclude a cause of action before it ever accrued, that was not the case here. Upon completion of the buildings a cause of action accrued for the harm done, namely, the cost of correction of the defects in the buildings constructed, or, if the defects were not remediable, the difference in value…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bellizzi v. Huntley Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. In re the Arbitration between Paver & Wildfoerster & Catholic High School Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Brushton-Moira Central School District v. Fred H. Thomas Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API