Legal Opinion

Tartaglia v. Paul Revere Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 17, 1996No. M 8-85PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

STEIN, District Judge.

Defendant The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company has moved pursuant to Rule 45(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an order compelling non-party Staten Island Hospital to produce and permit inspection and copying of documents in response to a subpoena previously served on it. That motion is granted in part and denied in part for the reasons set forth below.

Factual Background

The underlying breach of contract action in this case is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The action is based on Dr.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Condit v. DunneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Wolpin v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
  3. Glidden Co. v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  4. Stenovich v. Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & KatzNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Franzon v. Massena Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API