Legal Opinion
Condit v. Dunne
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 8, 2004No. 02 Civ. 9910(PKL)PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Defendant, Dominick Dunne, brings this motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 37(a) to compel plaintiff, Gary Condit, to provide deposition testimony regarding Condit’s 1) sexual relationship with Chandra Levy, Joleen Argentini McKay and Anne Marie Smith (“sexual relationships”); 2) real property interests, financial, and employment information (“financial information”), and; 3) belief regarding which specific portions of the statements alleged to be defamatory in plaintiffs complaint actually constitute a criminal accusation.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Orbit One Communications, Inc. v. Numerex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Trilegiant Corp. v. Sitel Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cohalan v. Genie Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.