Legal Opinion

Wolpin v. Philip Morris Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 23, 1999No. CV 98-3027 RAP JGXPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA’S MOTION FOR REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

PAEZ, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff Roselyn Wolpin has brought a suit in the Southern District of Florida against defendant Philip Morris, Inc., alleging that she has suffered health problems as a result of occupational exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke. As part of that action, defendant Philip Morris sought the production of certain raw data relating to an epidemiological study entitled “Lung Cancer in Nonsmoking Women” (hereinafter…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. BunnellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peters' BakeryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Calderon v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 2013
  4. Perry v. SchwarzeneggerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
  5. China National Metal Products Import/Export Co. v. Apex Digital, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API