Legal Opinion

Glidden Co. v. Jandernoa

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 5, 1997No. 1:96CV 72PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCOVILLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is a diversity case, in which plaintiff asserts that defendants breached fiduciary duties and committed fraud in connection with a leveraged buyout transaction. The case was initiated in the New York state courts, removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and then transferred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Presently pending before the court are several motions relating to documents withheld by the Perrigo defendants (all defendants - except Old Kent Bank and National Bank of Detroit)…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  5. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. v. PaasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
  3. Lane v. SHARP PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  4. El Camino Resources, Ltd. v. Huntington National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  5. Glidden Co. v. JandernoaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API