Dworkin v. First National Bank of Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
In this appeal appellant questions the superior court’s determination that his pro se complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. 1
At the outset it is necessary to determine whether the order entered below is a final judgment and thus appealable. 2 In City of Fairbanks v. Electric Distribution System, 3 we said:
In their motion to dismiss appellees contended that the order from which the appeal was taken was not a ‘final judgment,’ within the meaning of Supreme Court Rule 6, because the order dismissed the appellant’s complaint, rather than…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- John Marshall v. Grant Sawyer, as Governor of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Dictograph Products Co. v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Daniel Dewitt v. Officer R. F. Pail, Wesley M. Young, Assistant Superintendent, Southern Conservation CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Shooshanian v. WagnerAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Aspen Exploration Corp. v. SheffieldAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Linck v. Barokas & Martin, R.R.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hootch Ex Rel. Hootch v. Alaska State-Operated School SystemAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.