Legal Opinion

Aspen Exploration Corp. v. Sheffield

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1987No. S-1277PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Aspen Exploration Corporation and its president, R.V. Bailey (hereinafter collectively referred to as Aspen), challenge the dismissal of their complaint against former Governor Bill Sheffield. Aspen contends that the trial court erred in three respects: first, by misapplying the standard for determining the sufficiency of its complaint; second, by holding that the doctrine of executive immunity justified dismissal of its action; and third, by awarding Governor Sheffield attorney’s fees.

We conclude that the trial court applied the correct standard in determining the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Guerrero Ex Rel. Guerrero v. Alaska Housing Finance Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Brady v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API