Legal Opinion
Shooshanian v. Wagner
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1983No. 6841, 6874PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIMOND, Senior Justice.
This is an appeal of the superior court’s order dismissing the Shooshanians’ suit with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We reverse the superior court’s decision.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1977, appellants Joseph and Lucille Shooshanian began constructing a building to house their retail electronics supplies store and repair shop, with a second story designed as a residence for the couple. The original general contractor hired Dennis Wagner to insulate the building. After discussing the matter with Wagner, the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Tires ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- DiPetrillo v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.