American Employers Insurance v. Wentworth
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
It is not perceived how the correctness of the jury’s answer to the question submitted to it could have been affected by the refusal of the court to submit at the same time the issue of prompt notice of the accident to the insurance company. This issue, having been reserved for future determination, the plaintiff’s rights in re spect thereto have not been affected and it, therefore, takes nothing by its exception to the refusal of the court to submit this' issue to the jury.
The plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict upon the issue of permitted use does not invite extended consideration. It…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Elmer v. FessendenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hawkeye Casualty Co. v. StokerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Erie Insurance Group v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Raborn v. HaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Clooney v. ClooneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.