Legal Opinion

Kahn v. Seely

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided December 13, 2000No. 04-00-00072-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

This case involves the break-up of a successful law firm. The two principal lawyers of the firm, Claxton Seely and Robert Kahn, both industrious, talented attorneys who have tried or settled hundreds of cases find themselves incapable of reaching any sort of resolution of their own affairs. This appeal is a sequel. It follows a previous appeal and remand by this court.

The underlying suit involves the dissolution, winding up, and termination of a law partnership. Robert Kahn (“Kahn”) appeals the trial court’s judgment on remand, raising the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Ex Parte GrangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Martin v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASS'N INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. V-F Petroleum, Inc. v. A.K. Guthrie Operating Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Kahn v. Seely, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  2. Denton County v. Tarrant CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. River Oaks Place Council of Co-Owners v. Daly, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  4. Dean's Campin' Co. v. Peter Hardsteen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Dean's Campin' Co. v. Peter Hardsteen, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API