Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Seely
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided November 9, 1998No. 04-95-00917-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNCAN, Justice.
Two former law partners, Robert I. Kahn and Claxton B. Seely, appeal the trial court’s judgment setting forth the terms by which their law partnership will be dissolved and terminated. The primary issue presented is whether under the 1914 Texas Uniform Partnership Act a former partner is entitled to receive compensation in addition to his share of the firm’s profits for his post-dissolution services in winding up partnership affairs. We hold he is not, declining to follow the Third Court of Appeals’ opinion in Cofer v. Hearne, 459 S.W.2d 877 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1970,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carbo Ceramics, Inc. v. KeefeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- John Fox v. Judy Parker and Baylor University, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
- Molina v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2000
- Kahn v. Seely, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Paradigm Air Carriers, Inc. v. Texas Rangers Baseball Partners (In re Texas Rangers Baseball Partners)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.