Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Wakefield

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1986No. C-4463PublishedCited by 439 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GONZALEZ, Justice.

This case involves the refusal of a bank to honor a check given as earnest money under a contract for the sale of land. The issue presented is whether, under the doctrine of the “law of the case,” our “limited remand” of this cause precluded the assertion of additional related legal theories or defenses.

Robert Hudson and Andy Wright (Purchasers) sued to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property owned by Marion and Jean Wake-field (Sellers). In the original proceeding, the trial court granted sellers' motion for summary judgment on the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Trevino v. TurcotteTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kropp v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Hudson v. WakefieldTexas Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by439 opinions

  1. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Briscoe v. Goodmark Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Paradigm Oil, Inc. v. Retamco Operating, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pitman v. Lightfoot, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Ex Parte GrangerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

434 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API