AutoAlliance International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Chief Judge.
Pursuant to U.S. CIT R. 12(b)(1), the defendant, the United States, moves to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant argues that because the plaintiff, AutoAlliance International, Inc. (“AAI”), failed to file a summons in this Court challenging the partial denial of the protests to the original liquidation, the original liquidation of the subject merchandise has become final and conclusive. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s motion asserting that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2000). This Court has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- All Tools, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- American Power Pull Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015