Legal Opinion

Transflock, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 24, 1991No. 88-12-00953PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DiCARLO, Judge:

The United States Customs Service moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff opposes Customs’ motion and cross moves for an order compelling Customs to file its answer. The Court grants Customs’ motion.

This action involves three protests in which plaintiff challenged Customs’ classification of its merchandise under item 389.-62, Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). In Protest No. 2809-7-002078 and Protest No. 2809-7-002000, plaintiff claimed classification under item 273.75, TSUS or under item 256.87, TSUS. Customs reliquidated the merchandise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  2. Dumas (Juan B.) v. Office of Personnel ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  2. Autoalliance International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Novell, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  4. AutoAlliance International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  5. Wolff Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API