Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. Stumpf

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 13, 2005No. 04-637PublishedCited by 464 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

This case concerns respondent John David Stumpf’s conviction and death sentence for the murder of Mary Jane Stout. In adjudicating Stumpf’s petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit granted him relief on two grounds: that his guilty plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, and that his conviction and sentence could not stand because the State, in a later trial of Stumpf’s accomplice, pursued a theory of the case inconsistent with the theory it had advanced *178in Stumpf’s case. We granted certiorari to review both holdings. 543 U. S.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by464 opinions

  1. Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. PhelpsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Douglas Coley v. Margaret BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. MoussaouiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  5. State v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 2005

459 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API