Legal Opinion
State v. McNeil
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided May 23, 2013No. 20100695-CAPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOROS, Judge:
T1 Roland MeNeil appeals his conviction for aggravated assault. McNeil contends that the trial court committed reversible error by improperly admitting three pieces of evidence: paraphrased portions of telephone records, a statement made by the victim's daughter, and testimony regarding an unavailable witness's prior inconsistent statements. We affirm.
BACKGROUND 1
12 McNeil and a coworker named Allen worked the graveyard shift. A friendship developed, and they began driving to work together. MeNeil's adult son, Quentin, saw Allen pick McNeil up for work and talked to Allen…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. McNeilUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. LitiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- Williams v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.