Legal Opinion

State v. Ring

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2018No. Case No. 20150526PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Chief Justice Durrant authored the opinion of the Court, in which Associate Chief Justice Lee, Justice Himonas, Justice Pearce, and Justice Petersen joined.

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Durrant, opinion of the Court:

Introduction

¶1 George Ring was convicted of raping a three-year-old girl while she was playing in his girlfriend's apartment. Mr. Ring now appeals this conviction for three reasons. First, he claims that the district court erred by using each of the factors we previously articulated in State v. Shickles 1 ( Shickles factors) to determine the admissibility of his previous acts of child molestation. Second, he argues that even if the district court used the correct legal test, it nevertheless abused its discretion by admitting those previous acts of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  3. State v. WhytockCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  4. State v. KufrinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  5. Woodlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API