In Re Estate of Sutro
California Supreme Court
MOTIONS to dismiss appeals from a decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing partial distribution of the estate of a decedent, and from an order refusing a new trial. J. V. Coffey, Judge. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Morrison & Cope, Bradley & McKinstry, J. C. McKinstry, and U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, for Appellants. Charles S. Wheeler, Garret W. McEnerney, J. F. Bowie, and Walter Rothchild, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
This cause comes before us upon a motion to dismiss certain appeals.
Kate Nussbaum, Rosa V. Morbio, Clara A. English and Edgar E. Sutro, four of the surviving children of the deceased, and John C. Brickell, as trustee of Edgar E. Sutro, petitioned the superior court for the distribution to each of the said four children of a one-sixth interest in certain lands of said deceased claimed by them as heirs, which lands, they alleged, the deceased did not dispose of by his will. The appellants herein appeared in the superior court to oppose the petition for partial distribution and filed answers in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Budde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Earle v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Budde v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- In re Estate of Sutro, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.