In re Estate of Walkerly
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
In this estate one of the executors, Columbus Bartlett, filed a petition praying to he allowed a certain sum of money for alleged extraordinary services -rendered by him as such executor. Objections were made to the allowance prayed for by the other executors, and by various parties interested in the estate; and the matter having been heard, the court, on March 11, 1891, made an order denying said petition. After-wards, on March 30, 1891, the said Bartlett made and served notice of motion to vacate said order of March 11th, and to restore the cause to the calendar, upon the ground that no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Estate of WiardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Estate of CalahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- In re the Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by25 opinions
- Tuohy's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Logan v. ShelbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Crane v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re Estate of FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- In re the Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.