Legal Opinion

Department of Motor Vehicles of Cal. v. Rios

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 26, 1973No. 72-686PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a California motorist, was involved in an automobile collision on March 18, 1971. Both drivers filed accident reports with the California Department of Motor Vehicles as required by the California Financial Responsibility Laws. Without affording petitioner a hearing on the question of potential liability, and based solely on the contents of the accident reports, the Department found that there was a reasonable possibility that a judgment might be recovered against petitioner as a result of the accident. Since petitioner was uninsured and could not deposit security, his license was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Randone v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. California v. KrivdaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Skelly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rumford v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Beaudreau v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. County of Sacramento v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API