Legal Opinion
TRACKMAN v. Kenney
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 5, 2010No. C061165PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
The trial court granted defendant Mike Kenney’s motion to vacate a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiff Stephen O. Trackman, finding that the evidence showed no actual service on Kenney. Trackman appealed, and argues the trial court mistakenly relied on evidence instead of determining whether the proof of service is void on its face.
Kenney does not defend the trial court’s reasoning. As we shall explain, because Kenney’s motion was filed more than two years after entry of judgment, the trial court’s review was limited to the face of the record, and therefore the trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Calvert v. Al Binali, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Collins v. Sutter Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Quail Lakes Owners Ass'n v. KozinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Accelerant Specialty Insurance Company; Hadron Specialty Insurance Company; Palomar Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company; Texas Insurance Company; and Lloyd’s Syndicates per UMR B0507G02400002 v. Maverick Investments, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.