Legal Opinion

Schuholz v. Walker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1924No. 18193PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court upon the ground, as stated in its opinion, that the mechanic’s lien law requires the affidavits and notice provided for in Sections 8312, 8314, and 8315 to be served upon the contracting and not upon' the purchasing owner.

It is not necessary, however, in this opinion to consider the question whether the preliminary affidavit served by the subcontractor upon Anna Walter and Edward Walker, ostensibly under Section 8312, should have been given to Mrs. Runyon rather than to the Walkers. Schuholz was not a principal contractor, but a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KnowlesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. Rice v. CarmichaelColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Kuhleman v. SchulerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ohio State Board of Pharmacy v. FrantzOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Elmer J. Benes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  3. Williamson Heater. Co. v. RadichOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Guernsey Bank v. Milano Sports Enterprises, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Capital City Lumber Co. v. EllerbrockOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API