Murray v. Roc Lakeside, Inc., Unpublished Decision (2-18-1999)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
An accelerated appeal is authorized pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 25. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusory decision.Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 158; App.R. 11.1(E).
Plaintiffs-appellants1 appeal from the April 9, 1998 granting of defendants-appellees'2 motion for summary judgment. For the reasons adduced below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
The record indicates that the underlying action involved a motor vehicle accident. On Sunday, January 21, 1996, defendant-appellee Mr.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.