Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Taco Time International, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 5, 1981No. 4138-7-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

— This appeal involves the validity and application of a covenant not to compete contained in a fran chise issued by Taco Time International (TTI) to Evan L. Armstrong.

TTI, founded in 1960, is an Oregon corporation which owns and franchises Taco Time Mexican fast-food restaurants. In June 1965, TTI and Mr. Armstrong entered into a franchise agreement. This agreement granted Mr. Armstrong an exclusive franchise to the geographical area within a 50-mile radius of Spokane and contained the following covenant:

The Second Party [Armstrong] agrees not to compete with the NATACO [now TTI] in the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Davis v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. The State of Washington, Etc. v. The American League of Professional Baseball ClubsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. System Concepts, Inc. v. DixonUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Labor Ready, Inc. v. Williams Staffing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  3. South Bend Consumers Club, Inc. v. United Consumers Club, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1983
  4. Kutka v. Temporaries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  5. Riverview Floral, Ltd. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API