Kemppainen v. Suomi Temperance Society
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action on a promissory note, the complaint being in the usual form. In view of the questions presented on appeal the defenses may thus be summarized: (1) fraud; (2) absence of consideration; (3) want of authority on the part of the plaintiff, as president of defendant corporation, to execute the note on behalf of the corporation. Verdict and judgment were had in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1, 2. It is urged that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence the promissory note which is the basis of plaintiff’s cause of action, without proof of its execution.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- American National Bank v. KerleyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- Carter v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
- First Presbyterian Church v. DennisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Piner v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leonard v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- United States National Bank v. EmbodyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Zographos v. VichasOregon Supreme Court · 1935