Legal Opinion

Zographos v. Vichas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

The appealing defendant urges that plaintiff should not have been granted any relief because, as said defendant contends, plaintiff is in equity with unclean hands. In other words, appealing defendant invokes the maxim, “He who comes into equity must do so with clean hands”.

The mortgaged property is a hotel and its équipment. Except the corporate defendant, the General Petroleum Corporation of California, the parties hereto, plaintiff and defendants, are Greeks. One of the issues is whether plaintiff ousted the tenant of appealing defendant and, acting with one Gunis and George Zographos,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Maddock v. ConnollySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
  4. Ohio Galvanizing & Manufacturing Co. v. NicholSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Osborne v. GroppoOregon Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API