McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.
Plaintiffs are engaged in the contracting business in the Los Angeles area. They brought the present action against defendant labor unions and their officers for damages and injunctive relief against strikes allegedly called by defendants.
In their second amended complaint plaintiffs allege that plaintiffs and defendants are parties to a collective bargaining agreement known as the BCA-AF of L Master Labor Agreement. This agreement provides that a contractor shall have complete freedom in hiring workmen, except that he must first call on the local union having jurisdiction over the area in…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.