Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Olmstead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*728Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 20, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed April 22, 2003, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision.
Claimant was discharged from her position as a sales associate at a gas station and convenience store after she was observed on videotape stealing cigarettes. Criminal charges were brought against her as a result of this incident…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of HugginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of PetrosovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In rethe Claim of SingletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of KeelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of FarnsworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.