Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 23, 2005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 30, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant, a sales associate at a department store, was terminated from her position for stealing money from her employer. Although she initially was awarded unemployment insurance benefits, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board *974subsequently disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that she lost her employment due to misconduct.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of PetrosovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of RaspalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of SpanglerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of OlmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Claim of BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of WhaleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of AckermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of CongdonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.