Legal Opinion
In rethe Claim of Singleton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 19, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1231Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 29, 2008, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a security officer, was discharged from his employment due to misconduct. “An employee’s apparent dishonesty can constitute disqualifying misconduct” (Matter of Cincu [Sutton House, Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 43 AD3d 528, 529 [2007], lv denied 10…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of OlmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of CincuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of AckermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Claim of VelezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of BartonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of MustafaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009