Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 18, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant attended a benefits seminar at which one of the presenters inadvertently left her cell phone on a cabinet. When the presenter realized later in the day that her cell phone was missing, an investigation ensued, which ultimately resulted in claimant being discharged from employment for stealing the cell phone, making several calls (including long distance…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HugginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of BarrientosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of OlmsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of AckermannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re the Claim of KeelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Matter of Jean (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API