Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Bozarth

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 2, 1989No. 88SC244PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Quinn

The question in this case is whether the spousal testimonial privilege created by section 13-90-107(l)(a), 6A C.R.S. (1987), is applicable to a hearing on a motion for modification of child custody filed by the noncustodial father under circumstances where the custodial mother, who has remarried subsequent to the dissolution of her marriage to the father, invokes the spousal testimonial privilege in order to prohibit her present husband from testifying as to her care and treatment of the child. The district court ruled that the mother’s invocation of the spousal testimonial privilege…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Dill v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  4. Butler v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  5. Rayer v. RayerColorado Court of Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern Railroad v. HoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. Hartmann v. NordinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  3. People v. InmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. People v. WickhamColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Voight v. Colorado Mountain ClubColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API