Hartmann v. Nordin
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, we exercised jurisdiction over this original proceeding to determine whether plaintiffs in a medical malpractice action may assert the physician-patient and spousal privileges to prevent defense deposition questions regarding their own and their close family members' medical history that bears upon the injuries and damages that are at issue in this lawsuit.1
*46The plaintiff/wife in the underlying medical malpractice action, Mrs. Hartmann, is incapacitated. Her husband, Mr. Hartmann, maintains this lawsuit in her name as guardian and conservator, pursuant to a ruling of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- People v. CrossSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. DeadmondSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- B.B. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Belle Bonfils Memorial Blood Center v. District Court In & For the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cardenas v. JerathSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Zapata v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
- People v. SextonColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Reutter v. WeberSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Wideman v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.