Legal Opinion

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Hood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 10, 1990No. 89SC394PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn

The question in this case is whether the trial court, during a jury trial on a personal injury claim brought under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1989), erred in prohibiting the defendant from questioning the plaintiff and the plaintiff’s wife about a purported conversation in which the plaintiff allegedly admitted to his wife, who repeated the conversation to several other persons, that he had staged a work-related accident and had feigned the injuries for which he sought damages against the defendant-employer. The trial court ruled that such evidence was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. Clark v. District Court, Second Judicial District, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. People v. GarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Gayten v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. People v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API