Legal Opinion
Dill v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 34 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County. Indictment and conviction for the crime of perjury. Defendant Dili brings the cause to this court by writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Elliott
1. The sustaining of the demurrer to defendant’s plea of autrefois acquit is assigned for error.
It appears that in November, 1890, Sanford B. Dill instituted an action in the county court of Arapahoe county to" procure a divorce from his wife. ' In such action defendant made and filed an affidavit as follows:
“State of Colorado, ) County of Arapahoe, i
gg
In the County Court thereof.
Sanford B. Dill, Plaintiff, 1
v.
Susan A. Dill, Defendant. J
Affidavit.
“ Sanford B. Dill, being duly sworn says that he is the plaintiff in the above entitled action and that he has filed in *471said action a complaint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bassett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State v. SloanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Keator v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- State v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Lord v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Morris v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
- O'Loughlin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- Jordan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Bustamante v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.