Legal Opinion

Van Orden v. Madow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to vacate order granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the direction that plaintiff submit to an X-ray photograph is not authorized by Civil Practice Act, section 306. Kelly, P. J., Rich and Manning, JJ., concur; Kelby and Young, JJ., dissent, being of opinion that the X-ray photograph is authorized as an incident of the physical examination.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carrig v. OakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Lacqua v. General Linen Supply & Laundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Boyland v. LibmanNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Meany v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926