Legal Opinion

Meany v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1926Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order granting defendant’s motion for an X-ray examination of the plaintiff reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. (See Van Orden v. Madow, 207 App. Div. 827.) Kelly, *835P. J., Rich, Jayeox and Manning, JJ., concur; Young, J., votes to affirm the order. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for a resettlement of the prior order, by striking out the recital in such order of the affidavit of a physician, sworn to May 11, 1925, also reversed, and the motion granted, without costs. No opinion. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jayeox, Manning and Young, JJ.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Van Orden v. MadowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API