Legal Opinion

Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities Hospital

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Arthur D. Spatt, J.

Plaintiff claims that he has been rendered sterile by the malpractice of the defendants. Defendants seek to compel plaintiff to undergo a “semen test”. Must plaintiff accede to such a request, even though such compliance would cause plaintiff to undergo an alleged emotional, embarrassing and humiliating experience? For the reasons set forth below, the court finds that the plaintiff must undergo the “semen test”, as requested.

This is a motion for an order, pursuant to CPLR 3124 and 3121, compelling plaintiff to submit to a physical examination and to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  3. Goldman v. LinkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
  4. Chester v. ZimaNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Milam v. MitchellNew York Supreme Court · 1966

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Lapera v. ShafronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Evens v. Denny's, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Mosele v. BuresNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API