Carrig v. Oakes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by defendants Oakes from so much of an order of Special Term as denies to said defendants the right to have a cystoscopic examination of plaintiff as a part of a physical examination. In behalf of the plaintiff there is submitted an affidavit of a medical expert stating that a cystoscopic examination is “ a major operation * * * most painful, and * * * has been known to cause death.” In behalf of defendants there *139is submitted the affidavit of a medical expert stating that he never knew a case where, from a cystoscopic examination, there had “ been any very harmful, serious…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Bartolotta v. Delco Appliance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Grill v. Mathieson Alkali WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Van Orden v. MadowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Cardinal v. University of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1946
- Duprey v. WagerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Abex Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.