Legal Opinion

Carrig v. Oakes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by defendants Oakes from so much of an order of Special Term as denies to said defendants the right to have a cystoscopic examination of plaintiff as a part of a physical examination. In behalf of the plaintiff there is submitted an affidavit of a medical expert stating that a cystoscopic examination is “ a major operation * * * most painful, and * * * has been known to cause death.” In behalf of defendants there *139is submitted the affidavit of a medical expert stating that he never knew a case where, from a cystoscopic examination, there had “ been any very harmful, serious…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hayt v. Brewster, Gordon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Bartolotta v. Delco Appliance Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Grill v. Mathieson Alkali WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  4. Van Orden v. MadowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Adlerstein v. South Nassau Communities HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Cardinal v. University of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Duprey v. WagerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  5. Abex Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API