Boyland v. Libman
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
This is an action wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover damages for alleged personal injuries. Upon the argument of the motion for a physical examination of the plaintiff, and from the pleadings in the case, it is plainly evident that upon £he trial of the action the plaintiff will contend that he received a fracture to his wrist.
The report of Dr, Jason S. Parker, the physician making the *416examination of the plaintiff, shows that he is evidently unable to determine definitely whether such a fracture had in fact resulted from the accident, for in the concluding part of his report he uses the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hollister v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Van Orden v. MadowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923