Legal Opinion
Kinney v. Jos. Herspring & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1921No. Civ. No. 2317PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This action is against Joseph Herspring & Co. and Joseph Herspring, individually, the complaint alleging that “Jos. Herspring is the sole owner of and the sole person interested in the firm known and designated as Jos. Herspring & Co.”
The action is upon an alleged guaranty for the payment of a promissory note executed by one H. A. French to the plaintiff. Said note was dated at Sacramento, July 12, 1917, and was payable “one day after date, without grace,” and provides that “in case suit is instituted to collect this note or any portion thereof” the maker would pay any additional sum as the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonald v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Balfour & Garrette v. WorleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Lagomarsino v. GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Warder v. HutchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Ayoob v. AyoobCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.