Legal Opinion

Lagomarsino v. Giannini

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1905No. S.F. No. 3401PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The plaintiff sets forth in his complaint a promissory note for the principal sum of three hundred and fifty dollars, executed by the husband of the defendant in his lifetime to the plaintiff. He alleges further that he demanded payment and threatened suit against the maker of said note, and that thereupon the defendant promised that if the plaintiff would pay to her the sum of one hundred dollars and not commence the suit, the defendant would guarantee the payment of the said note of three hundred and fifty dollars and the further sum of one hundred dollars. That thereupon the said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humboldt Savings & Loan Society v. DowdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Leonard v. GallagherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Kinney v. Jos. Herspring & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Walsh v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API