Town of Jefferson v. Hicks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grant County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by W. J. Hicks against the Town of Jefferson and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Gass v. Dix (Wash.) 44 Pae. 113; Mo. Pac. R. Go. v. Keys (Kan.) 40 Pac. 275; Jones v. 8t. L. R. Go., 84 Mo. 151; Munkres v. K. G. R. Go., 72 Mo. 514; Gray v. McWilliams, 98 Cal. 157; McDaniels v. Cummings, 83 Cal. 515; 30 A. & E. Ene. L. 324, and cases cited. Cole v. M., K. & T. Ry.
Read the full summary
Error from District Court, Grant County; M. C. Garber, Judge. Action by W. J. Hicks against the Town of Jefferson and others. Decree for plaintiff, and defendants bring error. Gass v. Dix (Wash.) 44 Pae. 113; Mo. Pac. R. Go. v. Keys (Kan.) 40 Pac. 275; Jones v. 8t. L. R. Go., 84 Mo. 151; Munkres v. K. G. R. Go., 72 Mo. 514; Gray v. McWilliams, 98 Cal. 157; McDaniels v. Cummings, 83 Cal. 515; 30 A. & E. Ene. L. 324, and cases cited. Cole v. M., K. & T. Ry. Go., 20 Olda. 227; Crawford v. Rambo, 44 Ohio St. 279; Byrne v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Go., 38 Minn. 212; Bur-well v. Hobson, 12 Grat.…
1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.
The petition in this case is for an injunction, and was originally brought in the district court of Grant county, by defendant in error, hereafter designated as “plaintiff,” against plaintiffs in error, hereafter designated as “defendants.” The. trial in the court below resulted in a decree in favor of plaintiff, awarding him an injunction. Prom this decree a proceeding in error was filed in the Supreme Court of the territory where it was pending upon the admission of the state, and under the provisions of the Enabling Act the same is before this court for determination.
The trial judge, upon…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Walker v. New Mexico & Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- O'Connell v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Byrne v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Cairo, V. & C. Ry. Co. v. BrevoortU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Schweiger v. SolbeckOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Garrett v. HaworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.