Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Michel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1965No. 9441PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

September 20, 1958, the plaintiffs (respondents), husband and wife, entered into a contract with the defendants (appellants) for the sale by plaintiffs to defendants of a farm in Boundary county. The consideration in part consisted of the conveyance by defendants to plaintiffs of a farm property in Union county, Oregon, which was subject to an incumbrance of $64,000, which plaintiffs assumed and agreed to pay, and the conveyance by defendants to plaintiffs of a parcel of land in Payette county, Idaho. Defendants’ equity in the two parcels to be conveyed by them to plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Graves v. CupicIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Moruzzi v. Federal Life & Casualty Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Carlson v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Dyke v. ZaiserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. KingIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McEnroe v. MorganIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Dolbeer v. HartenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dohrman v. TomlinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API