Bump Pump Co. v. Waukesha Foundry Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The plaintiff by its complaint claims damages from the defendants, both compensatory and exemplary, and asks the court to enjoin the defendants from manufacturing pumps in competition with the plaintiff, and for an accounting of profits made in their competing pump business. The contended basis of the action is that the defendant Smith, a director of the plaintiff corporation, contrary to his duties and obligations as such director, conspired with the Foundry Company to and did develop and patent a competing pump and secretly erected a plant for its manufacture and in 1938 commenced the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barr v. Pittsburgh Plate-Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893
- New York Automobile Co. v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1905
- American Stoker Co. v. Underfeed Stoker Co. of AmericaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1910
- Barr v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1892
- Detroit Testing Laboratory v. RobisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raines v. ToneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
- Diedrick v. HelmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Gauger v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Melgard v. Moscow Idaho Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Havlicek/Fleisher Enterprises, Inc. v. BridgemanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992