Legal Opinion

New York Automobile Co. v. Franklin

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for an injunction and an accounting.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

John Wilkinson is a mechanical engineer. For some time he had been interested in automobiles and, finally, on September 19, 1899, he entered iiito a partnership contract with Frederick D. White, Arthur R. Peck and Ernest I. White. He agreed to devote his time to the construction of an automobile, the others to contribute the amount necessary for that purpose.

Some work on a model had already been done. This was now continued and the model was completed about January 1, 1900. Experiments showed that it was not altogether *10satisfactory, but the parties seem to have believed that there was promise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blake v. . Buffalo Creek R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Keokuk Northern Line Packet Co. v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Witmer v. Arkansas Dailies, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. GTI CORPORATION v. CalhoonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1969
  3. Tempo Instrument, Inc. v. Logitek, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  4. Red Top Cab Co. v. HanchettDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1931
  5. American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API